9/11 trial: Any mention of torture is classified, military judge rules

The military judge in the 9/11 trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others granted a government request to make all mention of alleged torture in the court classified. The defense called the ruling 'shameful.'

By Warren Richey,?Staff writer / December 12, 2012

In this photo of a sketch by courtroom artist Janet Hamlin and reviewed by the US Department of Defense, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed sits at a defense table wearing a camouflage vest in front of military judge U.S. Army Col. James Pohl, right, on Oct. 17.

Janet Hamlin/AP

Enlarge

In a significant victory for government prosecutors, the military judge presiding over the trial of accused 911 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has granted a government request to treat as classified any testimony or discussion about the alleged torture of Mr. Mohammed and others during CIA interrogations.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

The judge, US Army Col. James Pohl, issued a broad protective order barring the disclosure of any information deemed by the government to be classified. The ruling was handed down Dec. 6 and was made public on the court?s website on Wednesday.

Off limits at the military commission trial at the US Naval Base at Guant?namo Bay are any details surrounding the defendants? capture, detention, and alleged torture by the CIA. It includes ?the enhanced interrogation techniques that were applied to an accused ? including descriptions of the techniques as applied, the duration, frequency, sequencing, and limitations of those techniques.?

The judge added that ?without limitation, observations and experiences of an accused? would also be treated as classified information as they emerge from a defendant?s mouth.

Defense lawyers had challenged the government?s expansive assertion of authority to designate certain subjects as protected secrets in the case, saying it was improper for prosecutors to attempt to censor Mohammed and his four co-defendants from discussing their own personal observations of things they involuntarily endured during years of CIA detention and interrogations.

Defense lawyers and lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union argued that the government was exceeding its authority by declaring that anything Mohammed or his co-defendants might say would involve the disclosure of sensitive CIA sources and methods.

?We are profoundly disappointed by the military judge?s decision, which doesn?t even address the serious First Amendment issues at stake here,? said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU?s national security project.

?The government wanted to ensure that the American public would never hear the defendants? accounts of illegal CIA torture, rendition, and detention,? she said in a statement. ?The military judge has gone along with that shameful plan.?

Ms. Shamsi said the ACLU would attempt to appeal the ruling.

?For now, the most important terrorism trial of our time will be organized around judicially approved censorship of the defendants? own thoughts, experiences, and memories of CIA torture,? she said. ?The decision undermines the government?s claim that the military commission system is transparent.?

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/nc3owUM8pTA/9-11-trial-Any-mention-of-torture-is-classified-military-judge-rules

keystone xl sopa bill sopa and pipa